|
Until 1945, an act of war in the traditional, historical
sense was understood to mean any act by a State that would effectively
terminate the normal international law of peacetime and activate
the international law of war. The decision was invariably that of
the target State and was generally preceded by a statement warning
that certain acts would be considered acts of war and would trigger
hostilities. Belligerent and neutral States also used the term.
Belligerents would interpret as acts of war any action that seemed
to assist the enemy; neutrals, any infringement of their neutrality.
In 1945, the United Nations Charter banned the first use of force,
putting an end to declarations of war. Article 2(4) of the Charter
states: “All members shall refrain in their international
relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial
integrity or political independence of any State.” The last
formal declaration of war was made by the U.S.S.R. against Japan
in 1945. An example of modern State practice is provided by the
United Kingdom, which during the Suez War (1956) and the Falkland
Islands War (1982) strenuously denied that it was at war with, respectively,
Egypt and Argentina. Britain applied the law of international armed
conflict in its military operations, nevertheless.
The term “act of aggression” has to all intents and
purposes subsumed the legal term “act of war” and made
it irrelevant, although “act of war” is still used rhetorically
by States that feel threatened. The People’s Republic of China
stated in 1997 that any attempt by the Republic of China (Taiwan)
to declare independence would be regarded as an act of war; and
in August 1998, the U.S. Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright,
said that Osama bin Laden, the reputed mastermind of truck-bomb
attacks on two U.S. embassies in Africa, had “declared war
on the United States and struck first.” In the domestic law
of many States, “act of war” is also used in some contexts,
such as insurance and reparations claims, to refer to any use of
force in any armed conflict.
Following the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the
Pentagon on 11 September 2001, U.S. President George W. Bush declared
that America had been attacked and that the terrorists’ actions
constituted “acts of war” (they were also implicitly
recognized by the UN Security Council as giving rise to a right
of self-defense, albeit against a non-State group rather than a
State). This was followed by the U.S. Congress passing a Resolution
to give war powers to the President for the prosecution of the “war.”
Even so, use of the term “acts of war” to describe the
terrorist attacks of 9/11 is, in legal terms, fairly meaningless—acts
of war are committed by sovereign States—and it should be
viewed, again, as primarily rhetorical in nature.
(See terrorism)

|