The
term irregular is often used to describe a combatant who belongs
to a paramilitary group, militia, volunteer corps, organized resistance
movement, or rebel force. Irregulars are frequently part-time combatants
who do not wear a uniform or carry arms openly when on active duty.
However, irregulars can also be part of a countrys armed forces,
as they are in Switzerland, where the army is composed almost entirely
of uniformed militias.
Irregular is not necessarily a synonym for guerrilla.
Guerrillas are fighters distinguished by their use of tactics such
as ambushes, sniping, and sabotage. Irregulars might not use such
tactics at all, while regular armed forces often do.
In internal armed conflicts, the most important characteristic of
irregulars is that they prefer to blend into the civilian population
and thus, often, endanger civilians as government forces will destroy
or otherwise punish entire villages or towns in an attempt to neutralize
rebel irregulars.
Partisan is commonly used to describe irregulars who resist
the occupation of a country by a foreign powerfor example,
French Maquis in World War II. Partisans might operate inside or
outside occupied territory.
In international conflicts, irregulars may be considered lawful
combatants, entitled to prisoner of war status if they adhere to
certain standards. These include that they: distinguish themselves
from the civilian population (i.e., look like combatants); carry
weapons openly during engagements or deployments; be commanded by
a responsible officer and, generally, be expected to comply with
international rules relating to armed conflict. Failure to meet
these standards can lead to trial and punishment for hostile acts.
(Mercenaries, within the legal definition
set forth under the 1977 Additional Protocol I, are not entitled
to prisoner of war status.)
In internal armed conflict there is no prisoner of war status and
the government is free to try its armed enemies for treason or other
violent acts. Each trial, however, must be in a regularly
constituted court, affording all the judicial guarantees which are
recognized as indispensible by civilized people according
to Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions of 1949.

|