April 5, 2002


During the continuing siege of West Bank cities by the Israeli army, there have been numerous actions on both sides that may constitute violations of international law, according to well-placed observers.

Moreover, Israel’s attempt to close much of the West Bank to news reporters and human rights monitors has prompted concern that its army is seeking to operate without oversight or accountability.

Alleged violations of international humanitarian law by the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) include:

  • The use of military force without sufficient regard for the safety of civilians.
  • Deliberate damage to civilian property and infrastructure.
  • Refusal to allow medical personnel access to the wounded, and detention of medical workers.
  • Failure to ensure adequate food and medical supplies for civilians under occupation.
  • The coercion of Palestinian civilians into assisting with the operations of Israeli forces.
  • Execution of captured Palestinian fighters
  • Deliberate targeting of journalists in order to intimidate them

It can also be argued – though Israel disputes this – that the entire IDF operation in the West Bank in recent days constitutes a form of collective punishment, aimed not at an exclusively military objective but at demoralising the civilian population.

On the Palestinian side, continued suicide bombings and other acts of terror against civilians constitute a clear violation of international law. Israel has released a series of documents, captured during their latest offensive, which they claim shows that Yasser Arafat and his political colleagues are directly linked to the terror campaign. If so, Arafat and others in the Palestinian Authority leadership would be legally accountable for these crimes.

Since the Israeli army began its latest phase of operations on Friday March 29, there have been numerous reports of civilian casualties. On April 3 alone, nineteen Palestinians were reported killed in military operations; it is not known how many of these may have been terrorists. There have been reports in Western newspapers of civilians being shot for violating the curfew order in place in the cities that the IDF has occupied.

The distinction between military and civilian targets, and the requirement to avoid military operations that cause disproportionate harm to civilians, are fundamental principles of international law. They are embodied in Articles 48 and 51 of the first Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions. (Israel has not signed the Additional Protocols, but they are generally regarded as binding customary law.)

At mid-day on April 4, the Palestinian Red Crescent Society reported that: two of their medical personnel in Ramallah had been thrown out of ambulances and beaten; the PRCS maternity hospital in Ramallah raided; the ambulance station in Nablus blocked by IDF tanks; an ambulance crushed by a tank in Bethlehem. The PRCS said that its ambulances were unable to move in Ramallah, Nablus, Bethlehem, Jenin and Tulkarem, and that seven ambulances had been destroyed since March 29.

Freedom of access for medical personnel is protected under Article 35 of the first Geneva Convention, among other regulations.

The Palestinian Red Crescent Society also reported that the humanitarian situation in the cities where Israeli forces are operating was "approaching catastrophic proportions". They warned of "the destruction of road, water, electricity and telecommunications networks" and said that a "serious public health hazard" existed in Ramallah because of water shortages, destruction of city infrastructure, lack of access for medical care and interruption of garbage collection. A member of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees was arrested on April 2 after a UNRWA team made a delivery of food and medicine to Ramallah hospital.

Deliberate damage to civilian or civic property without military justification is forbidden under the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, as well as Article 52 of the first Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions. In addition, under Articles 55 and 56 of the fourth Geneva Convention, an occupying power has the duty of ensuring adequate food and medical supplies, and protecting public health, in areas under occupation.

News reports have spoken of Palestinian civilians being forced by Israeli soldiers to knock on doors and evacuate other Palestinian families.

According to Article 51 of the fourth Geneva Convention, civilians cannot be compelled to do work "which would involve them in the obligation of taking part in military operations".

On Sunday March 31 it was reported in several newspapers including the Washington Post and the Observer that five Palestinian fighters in Ramallah killed by IDF forces had wounds that suggested they may have been executed rather than fatally wounded during an exchange of fire.

The execution of soldiers who are "hors de combat" is regarded as one of the most severe breaches of international humanitarian law; it is forbidden by Article 13 of the third Geneva Convention and Article 40 of the first Additional Protocol.

On April 2, Reporters sans Frontieres said that at least eleven journalists had come under fire in Ramallah since the Israeli army declared it a "closed military zone" at the beginning of the siege. The IDF is attempting to prevent journalists gaining access to all areas where it is currently operating. Some correspondents have reported that they have been deliberately shot at to intimidate them and restrict their movement. On April 4, Israeli forces fired tear gas and stun grenades at a group of journalists outside Arafat’s headquarters in Ramallah, and threatened them by pointing the barrel of a tank at them, according to several eyewitness accounts.

Under Article 79 of the first Additional Protocol, journalists are entitled to the same protection as civilians and may not be deliberately targeted. There is no provision in the laws of war that forbids restrictions on journalists or human rights monitors, but Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (which Israel has ratified) guarantees the "freedom to seek, receive and impart information".

On April 4, Israeli forces continued to besiege Palestinian fighters and civilians who have taken refuge in the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem. Palestinian gunmen sheltering inside the basilica said that the Israeli army had blown open a metal door leading to a church courtyard and fired inside. The Israeli authorities have said they will not launch an attack on the building, and that they are offering safe passage for civilians inside to leave. They allege that Palestinian officials are preventing the civilians from leaving the church.

Religious buildings are protected under the 1899 Hague Conventions and Article 52 of the first Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions.

Collective punishments are forbidden under Article 33 of the fourth Geneva Convention. In official statements, the Israeli government has maintained that the purpose of its military actions is to root out terrorists and destroy the infrastructure that they rely on. However, unnamed Israeli officials were quoted recently in the Washington Post as saying that the operations in Palestinian areas are also designed to "teach them a lesson" or re-establish Israel’s "strategic deterrence". If these are indeed the purposes of the military action, it would seem to qualify as collective punishment.

Israel’s latest offensive followed a suicide attack against a Passover dinner at a hotel in Netanya that claimed 26 lives. Since March 28, a further 25 Israeli civilians (including two policemen) have been killed in terrorist attacks

On Tuesday April 2, the Israeli Defence Forces released a document they said had been seized during a raid on the Ramallah office of Fuad Shubeiki, a senior Palestinian Authority official. The document, apparently sent to Shubeiki by the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, demands to be reimbursed for the costs of suicide bomb attacks. On April 4, Israel released further documents suggesting that Yasser Arafat had directly authorized payments to people involved in the terrorist campaign as recently as January.

Deliberate attacks on a civilian population are explicitly forbidden under Article 51 of the first Additional Protocol. Political leaders who authorize such actions can be held legally responsible for them.

The Crimes of War Project will be publishing an Expert Analysis on the latest situation in the Middle East shortly.

Related chapters from Crimes of War: What the Public Should Know:

Arab-Israeli War
Israel’s Views of the Application of IHL to the West Bank and the Gaza Strip
Civilian Immunity
Civilians, Deliberate Targeting of
Collective Punishment
Executions, Extrajudicial
Hors de Combat
Indiscriminate Attack
Journalists, Protection of
Medical Transports
Terrorism Against Civilians

Related Links

Killings Raise Questions About Israeli Tactics
By Daniel Williams
Washington Post Foreign Service, March 31, 2002

For Sharon, Meaning of 'Victory' Grows Unclear
By Lee Hockstader
Washington Post Foreign Service, April 1, 2002

Without mercy: Israelis execute Arafat's elite guards
By Peter Beaumont
Ramallah Observer, Sunday March 31, 2002

West Bank Hospitals Perilously Low on Supplies
By Daniel Williams
Washington Post Foreign Service, April 5, 2002

Back to Top


This site © Crimes of War Project 1999-2003

The United States and the International Criminal Court: A Briefing
May 15, 2002

International Criminal Court to be Launched in July
April 15, 2002

Apparent violations of international law during Israeli actions in the West Bank
April 5, 2002

US Administration Defends Its Rules for Treatment of Afghan Captives
March 29, 2002


Sierra Leone Special Court Approved by UN Security Council
March 27, 2002


UN Secretary General Condemns Breaches of International Humanitarian Law in the Middle East
March 15, 2002


The Milosevic Trial - Part I
Summaries of the Charges
March 13, 2002


United States Calls for Dissolution of UN War Crimes Tribunals
March 6, 2002

Interview with US War Crimes Ambassador, Pierre-Richard Prosper
March 6, 2002

American Opposition to the International Criminal Court
March 6, 2002

International Court of Justice Strikes Blow to Belgium’s Attempts to Prosecute War Crimes
February 15, 2002

U.N. Ends Negotiations On War Crimes Tribunal for Cambodia
February 15, 2002

Treaty Banning Child Soldiers Enters Into Force
February 15, 2002

The Milosevic Trial: How to Follow It
February 15, 2002

UN War Crimes Court Approved for Sierra Leone
January 8, 2002

Symbolic War Crimes Tribunal for Japanese "Comfort Women"
December 10, 2001

Justice in Practice: Human Rights in Court Aministration, JSMP, Dili, 13/12/01
December 10, 2001