Special Edition Home | On the News | Related Links | Expert Analysis Home  

APV Rogers, OBE Author, Law on the Battlefield, Fellow, Lauterpacht Research Centre for International Law, University of Cambridge
Eyal Benvenisti
Professor of International Law, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem
Visiting Professor, Columbia Law School
Michael Matheson
Senior Fellow
U.S. Institute of Peace
H. Wayne Elliott, S.J.D.
Lt. Col. (Ret.) U.S. Army Former Chief, International Law Division; Judge Advocate’s General School, U.S. Army
Robert Kogod Goldman
Professor, Washington College of Law
American University
Steven R. Ratner
Albert Sidney Burleson Professor in Law University of Texas Law School
David Turns, LL.M (London), Barrister
Lecturer in Law
The Liverpool Law School
Marc Cogen
Professor of International Law, Ghent University
Surya Narayan Sinha, Former UN Legal Adviser in Kosovo, Zagreb, and for UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, International Lawyer based in Chennai, India.

September 21, 2001


Our experts agree that, having sustained an unlawful armed attack, the U.S. has the legitimate right to self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter. The U.S. would have no obligation to obtain prior authorization from the UN Security Council, but must report to the Council any actions so taken. David Turns notes that, “the need for response [must] be instant and overwhelming, with an element of urgency… The longer the U.S. waits before responding militarily to the September 11 attacks, the less it may look like pure self-defense.”

For the first time ever, the NATO Charter—which declares an attack on one member State to be an attack on all members—was invoked, and this could yield an unprecedented cooperative effort. No prior authorization is needed from NATO for a unilateral U.S. response.

At the same time, all our experts stressed the importance of building and maintaining a multi-national coalition to end the deadly menace of terror. “If threats work, so much the better,” says Eyal Benevenisti, “if they encourage cooperation from factions who have harbored bin Laden (assuming he is responsible).”


Trial, Detention or Release?

"Terrorism and the Laws of War"

Were the attacks of September 11 an “act of war”?


What are the legal limitations and restrictions on any US or international response?


What are the roles of the UN and NATO in formulating a response?


What are the legal distinctions between retaliation, reprisal,and revenge?


Is there a role for an international court?


POWs or Unlawful Combatants?

"Prosecuting Al Qaeda"

"Is This a New Kind of War?"

Reports of War Crimes in Afghanistan